Cit vs mysore chromite ltd
WebCIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98. 37. P.S.N.S. Ambalavana Chettiar v. Express Newspapers Ltd. (1968) 2 SCR 239 : AIR 1968 SC 741. 38. Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. (1997) 5 SCC 516 : AIR 1997 SC 2502. 39. Pearson v. WebMar 11, 2011 · Mysore Minerals Ltd. (2) 2001 250 ITR...725 Kar This was a case in respect of mining of granite. The Division Bench held that it would amount to manufacture relying on an earlier judgment in CIT v. Mysore Minerals Ltd. (1... Deputy Commissioner Of …
Cit vs mysore chromite ltd
Did you know?
WebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are … WebCIT vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority (2010) 322 ITR 61 (P & H) 14.S. 22 - INCOME FROM HOUSE PROPERTY – BUSINESS INCOME - S. 28 . Rent from premises with fittings. Appointment between business income and income from house property held to be justified. CIT & Anr. vs. Mysore Inter Continental Hotel P. Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 116 …
WebJul 27, 2015 · Podar Cement Private Limited (1997) 226 ITR 625 and Mysore Minerals v CIT 106 Taxman 166 the legal position is no longer res integra. In Podar Cement Private Limited the Supreme Court was called upon to consider whether the income derived by the assessee on the flat or the building were income from other sources and not income from … WebMysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) January February March April May June July August September October November December. The …
WebMysore Sugar Co. Ltd., AIR 1967 SC 723 107 110 Business Expenditure –Allowability - Tests of distinctions between Business expenditure and Capital expenditure [section … WebMysore Chromite Ltd . (1) held that in respect of the five cases in which the assessee drew the bills in favour of the buyers the sales were effected in Pakistan whereas in the two cases in which the bills were drawn in favour of the assessee's agent at Calcutta, the sales were effected in India. (1) 27 I.T.R. 128. 140
WebNov 3, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 Posted on June 30, 2024 CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Continue reading Posted in LLB III Sem, Special Contracts, Topic 7: Effects of Sale, Uncategorized Leave a comment
WebMysore Chromite Ltd.(1) held that in respect of the five cases in which the assessee drew the bills in favour of the buyers the sales were effected in Pakistan whereas in the two … cryptokitties smart contractWebCIT v. Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. - Taxpublishers.in User Panel Home Income Tax Case Laws Analysis Relied on Nortel Networks India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT 2024 TaxPub (DT) 6419 (Del … cryptokitties twitterWebsentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the … crypto in rupeesWebJUSTICE VISWANATHA SASTRI Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras - Appellant Versus Mysore Chromite Limited - Respondent Case No : No Decided On : 29 March 1951. … cryptokitties to phpWebA Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 695 - Mahalinga Padmanabhan - There would seem to be a conflict between this decision and the one reported in Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. Mysore Chromite Ltd., (S) AIR 1955 SC 98. The main point in controversy is whether the paying or negotiating or the … crypto in rsWebThe Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Mysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) DAS, SUDHI RANJAN MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ) HASAN, GHULAM BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H. Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (Act XI of 1922), s. 4-Profits derived by the assesseeWhether arose or were received in British Indian in the … cryptokitties toolsWebJan 12, 2024 · CIT (A) has upheld the disallowance of Rs.77,18,481/-being claim of sustainable development expenses by simply recording the fact that “assessee has not adduced any cogent argument for deleting the sustainable development expenses”, without going into the fact that in the earlier years, sustainable development expenses are being … cryptokitties wert